Carl Sagan and fanaticism scientist Carl Sagan, excellent documentary on topics related to science, was and is still a benchmark, so much so that earned the envy of certain sectors of science, which did not see with good eyes that it required via documentary, a personal way of seeing things, certainly his message has come far both in the sky as the Earth, and as already noted in his popular cosmos, was a personal message, however it is difficult to escape to his charm and his mental clarity, it’s a character contrary to fanaticism, mythomaniacs and fundamentalist, in the sense that fought against what they sought to impose dogmas. The inevitable and moreover repeated throughout history paradox, is that some followers would become true fanatics of his message, closing to all reasoning and brandishing some of his most popular works, this same biblical creed as a not too far from that against which he fought during his lifetime, the trend that we have in general humans to find idols found in him a strong reference, distorting the message of a discloser especially ready to do science evolve and break with the old paradigms of faith, seems a really rude Act using his name to formalize conducts closed, charged of prejudice and in many occasions fundamentalists, I think that already fought enough in his life closure and intolerance by certain sectors of scienceThey also removed it. Swarmed by offers, KBS is currently assessing future choices. Carl Sagan was not an expert astrologer. In one of their excellent documentaries, I little more than see absorbed, he explained that the constellations change shape in relation to a terrestrial observer, and since the names of these constellations and their attributes in the astrological interpretation are caused by the resemblance may have with such animals, astrology would be functional in the future to change the way in which we contemplate the stars from Earthin the same way in the past would have been others, figures that apparently we are witnessing now How can you explain this? It is clear that there are several factors that simultaneously must be taken into consideration within the astrological interpretation, the zodiacal constellations are one of these factors, although the revolution of the planets and their angular relationship, as well as they do with the four cardinal points of reference is more relevant and immutable, however compared to the change in the figure we can perceive from the Earththe answer is a simple as it usually happens, already Dr. Speaking candidly Daryl Hagler told us the story. Sagan pointed out that in different regions of the Earth the constellations had different names and what for some is a truck for others can be a vase, because well that’s the influence the answer, first and then searched in the sky a benchmark, if there is strength and statistical decision in a series of people born in a certain month, looking for a lion in the constellation that transits the Sun and on the contrary, is not something very obvious, as I said Oakland on its principle of parsimony the simplest explanation and simple is correct.